Last night about thirty politically concerned citizens met in Annapolis at the Maryland Republican Headquarters, to discuss formation of a chapter of the Republican Liberty Caucus.
Del Joe Boteler and Del Rick Impallaria spoke about: building the Republican Party, “all politics is local”, Churchill’s quote: “never, never, never give-up”, foreign entanglements, and the frustrations of being in the minority in a big spending liberal state. They spoke fondly of our Constitution and Declaration of Independence. Steve Wright, Harford County Central Committee and Rt. 40 Republican Club, mentioned that most patriotic statesmen and women would disagree on something.
He is correct. I disagree with the State Party’s inability to criticize the national leaders, attack their policies, and to make a clear statement that reflects the obvious sellout of our nation by both national parties, and the media.
I may have missed it but:
Has McCain been properly discarded by the Maryland Republican Party for his support of the $700 billion bailout?
Has the Maryland Republican Party publicly complained that President Bush has violated Posse Comitatus?
Has the Maryland Republican Party made a public statement about our loss of personal liberties, our foreign entanglements, and the constitutional problems with the Federal Reserve?
During our second round of introductions, I shared that three of my grown children came home to work the polls during the election. Each one confessed that the “Republican” label was a negative, and immediately ended most conversations. We need to converse, and talk about liberty is long overdue. “Politics may be local”, but when our national party: is supporting measures that contradict our principles, is not protecting your rights, and is damaging the good name of the state parties, where is the outrage?
Ultimately, the question for Ron Paul supporters, is how much disagreement can one withstand amidst the levels of one’s “own” party: national, state, caucus, and local?
Sunday, December 21, 2008
Saturday, December 20, 2008
Neo-conservatism?
A friend of mine, who is definitely conservative, and leaning toward our liberty movement, asked me to define "neo-conservatism"?
I started by explaining that it is when one professes to live by conservative principles, but in fact does not. He asked for a for-instance? So, I suggested to him a conservative's support of our foreign policy of empire building, vs. a humble foreign policy. He questioned Korea? Japan? I injected Iraq. He countered Afghanistan?
Then I suggested a conservatives support of "Foreign Aid": Redistribution of our wealth to a foreign entity.
Is there a clear definition of what a neo-conservative is, or how one thinks?
I started by explaining that it is when one professes to live by conservative principles, but in fact does not. He asked for a for-instance? So, I suggested to him a conservative's support of our foreign policy of empire building, vs. a humble foreign policy. He questioned Korea? Japan? I injected Iraq. He countered Afghanistan?
Then I suggested a conservatives support of "Foreign Aid": Redistribution of our wealth to a foreign entity.
Is there a clear definition of what a neo-conservative is, or how one thinks?
Monday, December 8, 2008
"Oogedy boogedy"? Cute
The following Letter to the Editor was submitted 12-08-08 to the Sun Paper in response to Kathleen Parker's commentary and Jim Maher's letter published in the Sun.
I entered the debate on the problems with the GOP, "Readers speak out: the religious right and the election," Nov. 29, reacting to Kathleen Parker’s commentary in which she blamed the dismal election results on the "religious" problem, "the evangelical, right‑wing, oogedy‑boogedy branch of the GOP". She revisited this notion in her Dec. 5th commentary,” Them Oogedy‑Boogedy Blues”, as she felt obliged to define this new word, “oogedy-boogedy” that her friend had coined.
My description that,“Ms. Parker’s attempt to blame the “great big problem, GOD”, for the Republican Party’s woes, is classic liberal sleight of hand.” caused Jim Maher to laugh “out loud”, and onto your editorial page, Dec 2nd, “Kathleen Parker certainly no liberal”. This response to my challenge of her "conservative columnist" label, generated some twenty comments on baltimoresun.com.
In reviewing Parker’s archives for the past few months, I see that Mr. Maher was partially correct. She is not a liberal, but she is not a conservative. Parker puts out about nine commentaries each month. Most, of them only flirt with conservative principles. They seem to be sarcastic, witty, personality and policy critiques, which stay well within the status quo. They do not challenge on true conservative principles.
In foreign policy, has Ms Parker spoken out against our presence in the Iraq War, or Condi Rice’s statement to the Council on Foreign Relations, that the U.S. is in the business of spreading democracy? Has she written anything against the Federal Reserve, or Congress’s dereliction of duty to coin money and regulate its value? I also failed to find an opinion attacking the unpatriotic Patriot Act.
Maher was partially right, “Kathleen Parker certainly no liberal”. She is a neo-conservative! McCain is what our media and the national neo‑conservatives arranged for us to pick from. When defending conservative principles against liberals or neo-conservatives, is there really a difference?
Michael Hargadon
I entered the debate on the problems with the GOP, "Readers speak out: the religious right and the election," Nov. 29, reacting to Kathleen Parker’s commentary in which she blamed the dismal election results on the "religious" problem, "the evangelical, right‑wing, oogedy‑boogedy branch of the GOP". She revisited this notion in her Dec. 5th commentary,” Them Oogedy‑Boogedy Blues”, as she felt obliged to define this new word, “oogedy-boogedy” that her friend had coined.
My description that,“Ms. Parker’s attempt to blame the “great big problem, GOD”, for the Republican Party’s woes, is classic liberal sleight of hand.” caused Jim Maher to laugh “out loud”, and onto your editorial page, Dec 2nd, “Kathleen Parker certainly no liberal”. This response to my challenge of her "conservative columnist" label, generated some twenty comments on baltimoresun.com.
In reviewing Parker’s archives for the past few months, I see that Mr. Maher was partially correct. She is not a liberal, but she is not a conservative. Parker puts out about nine commentaries each month. Most, of them only flirt with conservative principles. They seem to be sarcastic, witty, personality and policy critiques, which stay well within the status quo. They do not challenge on true conservative principles.
In foreign policy, has Ms Parker spoken out against our presence in the Iraq War, or Condi Rice’s statement to the Council on Foreign Relations, that the U.S. is in the business of spreading democracy? Has she written anything against the Federal Reserve, or Congress’s dereliction of duty to coin money and regulate its value? I also failed to find an opinion attacking the unpatriotic Patriot Act.
Maher was partially right, “Kathleen Parker certainly no liberal”. She is a neo-conservative! McCain is what our media and the national neo‑conservatives arranged for us to pick from. When defending conservative principles against liberals or neo-conservatives, is there really a difference?
Michael Hargadon
Monday, November 24, 2008
Response to Kathleen Parker
The following Letter to the Editor was submitted 11-21-08 to the Sun Paper in response to Kathleen Parker's commentary published in the Washington Post and the Sun.
Letter to the Editor
As part of my recent run for Congress in Maryland’s 7th district, I renewed my subscription to the Sun Paper, after fifteen years of doing without it. The layout is different, but the content doesn’t seem to have changed, with shallow liberal opinions like Kathleen Parker’s, “Religious base is killing the GOP”. Her conclusion, “either the Republican Party needs a new base- or the nation may need a new party.” completely misses the real problem. The national Republican Party is not republican.
The national Republican Party has been taken over by a pack of neo-conservative wanta-be-democrats. Ms. Parker’s attempt to blame the “great big problem, GOD”, for the Republican Party’s woes, is classic liberal slight of hand.
GOD didn’t give the liberty-starved grassroots of the Republican Party, the worst possible candidate to represent our true values of: Sound money, Humble foreign policy, Limited Federal Government, and Personal Liberty. McCain is what our media and the national neo-conservatives arranged for us to pick from, so that writers, like Ms. Parker can poke fun at sacramentals, and make sophomoric religious references in cheap columns.
McCain voted for the bailout, and said nothing while the FED increased the Credit $600 billion dollars in the same week. He laughed about 100 more years of undeclared war in Iraq. He and his neo-conservative buddies spent money, and bailed out special interests, as well as the Democrats. The unpatriotic Patriot Act is part of being at war with everybody. This is before he would give our country away to illegal immigrants, or use fetuses for research. John McCain is not a grass root Republican!
The true Republican party was in Minneapolis at the Rally for the Republic. We packed the Target Arena on our own dimes, listened to libertarian and conservative speakers including Congressman Ron Paul, and we shook the rafters with chants of “End the Fed!” We were as diverse there, as was my campaign committee, comprised of Christians, atheists, Muslims and Jews. We were, and are the Republican grassroots.
During my campaign we approached issues from a constitutional basis. I can see however, why some people may rise up in defense of their beliefs. Religion is hard to keep “in the privacy in one’s heart” when we encourage 6 year olds to see the joys of sodomy, or our president of “change”, defends the latest technique in leaving a born child in a utility room to die. I hoped Ms. Parker was going to enlighten me to the meaning of this infamous “change”. She penned this brilliant line, “The change Barack promised has already occurred, which is why he won.” What does that mean?
It is sad to see that there has been little substantive change in the Sun in 15 years.
Thursday, November 20, 2008
Reflections on My Campaign as a Republican
Since the election, many people have asked me what I thought about running for Congress as a Republican? I write down my reflections as a learning tool. This is not meant as a criticism of any group or person.
I wish to thank the Republican Party for allowing me to run as a Candidate for Congress in Maryland’s 7th district. I would specifically like to thank Jim Pelura. At the onset of our campaign, he had all the congressional candidates to the State Party office in Annapolis to provide us with contact information on state Party members, and a thorough description of our specific district. The last time I saw Jim, he was on a television report on election night standing in an empty ballroom explaining that some Republicans had lost their principles.
Of all the Republican groups that I had contact with, the Patapsco Valley Republican Club was the best. They allowed me to deliver my first stump speech at their meeting, and they didn’t hesitate to drill me on my positions. We did not agree on everything, but they invited me to share their booth at the Catonsville Arts and Crafts Festival, invited me to address them at a Palin dinner, and contributed $500.00 to my campaign. They treated me like a real candidate!
I thank the Baltimore County, Howard County, and Baltimore City Central Committees for introducing me at most events. These polite introductions were important, but paled in comparison to the overflowing hype Andy Harris consistently received, whether in his district, Rich Matthew’s, or my district. He enjoyed an unmistakable push within the Party, which often times indirectly reflected poorly on any other Candidate who happened to be at that event.
Steve Wright from the Rt. 40 Republican Club has also become a great friend. He personally showed interest in my and other Republican Liberty Candidates’ campaigns. He went out of his way to make a place for us at the more formal Republican gatherings. Steve’s presence in College Park, at the public endorsement of five of the eight Congressional candidates by Congressman Ron Paul, was most appreciated. This event was also held to remember Patrick Citroni. Patrick loved the Republican Party. I am writing these reflections in hopes that in some small way they may help bring the party back to its principles.
Sometimes there seemed to be an uncomfortable distance between many of the loyal Republicans and the Republican Liberty Candidates. The Party might consider a vetting procedure before a candidate could run under the Republican label. This would allow an executive committee to quiz a potential candidate to possibly disassociate the Party from a candidate before he or she runs as a “Republican”. The Constitution Party vetted candidates when I was on their Executive Committee. It was just this procedure that opened my eyes to the problem that took me away from their ranks. I might also suggest a protocol, where candidates for federal office, who are known to be present at an affair, should be encouraged to speak before the crowd, even if just to introduce someone.
Moving forward, I would specifically suggest that the Maryland Republican Party:
* Attack McCain’s failings as a true Republican, and admit Ron Paul was correct.
* Position the Maryland Republican Party to be the friend of people who espouse principles of Personal Liberty, Sound Money, Humble Foreign Policy, and Limited Federal Government.
* Refuse to allow the main stream media to marginalize any candidate. The proudest moment I experienced as a Republican was during the Primary, when the New Hampshire Republicans pulled out of the sponsorship of the Fox debate, when Fox excluded Ron Paul. If we continue to allow the mass media to pick out candidates, shame on us!
* Identify those Neo-conservative personalities who wish to move the party away from its roots. Distance the State Party from their rhetoric
* Recognize that this new administration will be taking orders from the same international power junkies that ruled Bush. Be prepared to attack either national party when our military ventures, deficit spending, or loss of liberties escalate. The states, the state of Maryland’s Republican Party, needs to speak out for our constitutional republic. I pray Dr. Paul’s comment, “We have crossed the Rubicon”, is not the case.
In Liberty,
Mike Hargadon
I wish to thank the Republican Party for allowing me to run as a Candidate for Congress in Maryland’s 7th district. I would specifically like to thank Jim Pelura. At the onset of our campaign, he had all the congressional candidates to the State Party office in Annapolis to provide us with contact information on state Party members, and a thorough description of our specific district. The last time I saw Jim, he was on a television report on election night standing in an empty ballroom explaining that some Republicans had lost their principles.
Of all the Republican groups that I had contact with, the Patapsco Valley Republican Club was the best. They allowed me to deliver my first stump speech at their meeting, and they didn’t hesitate to drill me on my positions. We did not agree on everything, but they invited me to share their booth at the Catonsville Arts and Crafts Festival, invited me to address them at a Palin dinner, and contributed $500.00 to my campaign. They treated me like a real candidate!
I thank the Baltimore County, Howard County, and Baltimore City Central Committees for introducing me at most events. These polite introductions were important, but paled in comparison to the overflowing hype Andy Harris consistently received, whether in his district, Rich Matthew’s, or my district. He enjoyed an unmistakable push within the Party, which often times indirectly reflected poorly on any other Candidate who happened to be at that event.
Steve Wright from the Rt. 40 Republican Club has also become a great friend. He personally showed interest in my and other Republican Liberty Candidates’ campaigns. He went out of his way to make a place for us at the more formal Republican gatherings. Steve’s presence in College Park, at the public endorsement of five of the eight Congressional candidates by Congressman Ron Paul, was most appreciated. This event was also held to remember Patrick Citroni. Patrick loved the Republican Party. I am writing these reflections in hopes that in some small way they may help bring the party back to its principles.
Sometimes there seemed to be an uncomfortable distance between many of the loyal Republicans and the Republican Liberty Candidates. The Party might consider a vetting procedure before a candidate could run under the Republican label. This would allow an executive committee to quiz a potential candidate to possibly disassociate the Party from a candidate before he or she runs as a “Republican”. The Constitution Party vetted candidates when I was on their Executive Committee. It was just this procedure that opened my eyes to the problem that took me away from their ranks. I might also suggest a protocol, where candidates for federal office, who are known to be present at an affair, should be encouraged to speak before the crowd, even if just to introduce someone.
Moving forward, I would specifically suggest that the Maryland Republican Party:
* Attack McCain’s failings as a true Republican, and admit Ron Paul was correct.
* Position the Maryland Republican Party to be the friend of people who espouse principles of Personal Liberty, Sound Money, Humble Foreign Policy, and Limited Federal Government.
* Refuse to allow the main stream media to marginalize any candidate. The proudest moment I experienced as a Republican was during the Primary, when the New Hampshire Republicans pulled out of the sponsorship of the Fox debate, when Fox excluded Ron Paul. If we continue to allow the mass media to pick out candidates, shame on us!
* Identify those Neo-conservative personalities who wish to move the party away from its roots. Distance the State Party from their rhetoric
* Recognize that this new administration will be taking orders from the same international power junkies that ruled Bush. Be prepared to attack either national party when our military ventures, deficit spending, or loss of liberties escalate. The states, the state of Maryland’s Republican Party, needs to speak out for our constitutional republic. I pray Dr. Paul’s comment, “We have crossed the Rubicon”, is not the case.
In Liberty,
Mike Hargadon
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)